Further observations about physics – split files
(31)Thoughts on Distance and Time vectors
The idea that light energy can be "entangled" into what we regard as electron positron pairs (forthwith e-po pairs to signify this truly entangled entity) is intriguing because it opens out a different perspective to explore. I have already conjectured that a "photon" pair can interact to create a (rectified) electron and a (rectified) positron pair. However, when these are created in a universe/antiverse reflected pair the photonic umbilicus consists of light moving from electron to positron and vice versa in a "counter flow" (like a motorway or freeway). The effect is for the rectified elements (the electron and positron) to appear to flow away from each other at, at least, the velocity of light if not twice the velocity of light. What is the vector? It is directly into and out of the connecting e-po umbilicus. This results in a separation and transformation of the classic 3-distance-dimensional (universal) vectors into a strange new set of 3-time-dimensional vectors. When looked at from the antiversal viewpoint, the emphasis is reversed with any universal distance now looking like a time dimension from the antiversal perspective.
So, what is the vector of this "VoL" (velocity of light)? It is a velocity either vertically into or out of this e-po umbilical vortex tunnel. Where does the tunnel "point" (or lead to)? Well, we need to remember that, when standing stock still for one minute on remembrance day, we are actually careering along at a combined 1,370,000 km/hr or about 380 km every second. So, the past is already a long way behind us in one second; and the origin of the three time dimensions, that complement the space dimensions, is a long way off "in the rear mirror" – so the three independent time dimensions look very much like a single time dimension pointing back to where we have just come from.
When you put a lot of electrons together and then create neutrons and protons from them (as they "vortex" into the complex tunnels between universal matter and antiversal antimatter), we start to see the likelihood that there is a proximity-induced electromagnetic attraction across this tunnel, analogous to a Zwitterion effect where, although the overall charge of a molecule is zero, the structural position of internal ions of a molecule results in a polarisation. And, universal matter is coated with electrons and (assumedly) antiversal matter is coated with positrons. We don't notice this imbalance until we try to bring two electron shells very close together; then we (metaphorically) "hit our heads against a brick wall".
This leads on to a scaling up when we go from one electron to one atom, to a molecule, to a rock, to a comet, to a planet, to a sun, to a neutron star, to a black hole. We can imagine that the convergence and eventual confluence of these umbilici are short cutting this gravitational well, rather like a "wormhole".
So, what will we perceive to flow into or out of this converging web of gravitational wells? I think that this will be the neutrinos (as the antiversal representatives of our electrons). One thing that is likely is that the decay from a tau- to a muon- to an electron-neutrino may "flow" in the opposite time direction to what we naturally expect, with electron-neutrinos apparently able to decay into muon-neutrinos and muon-neutrinos apparently able to decay into tau-neutrinos. This could account for the confusing observation of neutrino oscillations. It may also be relevant to the high energy neutrinos that appear to "spring up" into space from beneath the arctic polar cap.
But, don't be confused. The "past" for antiversal matter is a position. The further away it is from its umbilical matter – that it is twinned with – the slower the rate of apparent separation will be (its segregation eventually stopping) and it's gravitational effect will be to "paint" a halo around visible matter. Remember that the light wave is an oscillation consisting of a phase of (magnetic) potential energy alternating with a phase of (electric) kinetic energy. Matter – electrons particularly – reflect a point like phase of kinetic energy because it is moving away from its entangled positron at it's maximum velocity. (See previous Other Observations 30 and remember zitterbewegung that helps to make an "electro-point" seem to be uninterrupted; that's analogous to the 50 frames/second of a movie or TV screen – we happily perceive it to be continuous and not intermittent.)
This leads onto some preliminary thoughts about rectification. My conjecture is that there is, effectively, a universe and antiverse in a sort of mirror image state, with entropy reversed from one "side" to the other; this opens up various points to make. It strikes me that the "mass shell" proffers a possible mechanism to effect this entropic mirroring and rectification. We know there is a ghostly world of neutrinos out there that can simply glide through a light year of solid lead (that is an illustrative analogy of course). Also, we know that there ought to be negative energy solutions to the Dirac equation. I have already suggested that high energy is effectively, a highly unstable and improbable state. Increasing probability and instability is its core essence; but this invokes a time direction – energy flows from focally unstable and low entropy states towards increasing bland and microscopically "stirred" states. The energy available to do work is highest in the past and lowest in the future. So, is negative energy highest in the future and lowest in the past. Since entropy dictates time, that would fit with the idea that a positron appears to be "flowing" backwards in time (Feynman diagrams). Universal positrons are produced by highly energetic interactions of photons but an antiversal positron may well be manifest as a neutrino. Tau to muon to electron neutrino decay may, therefore, be going from our future to our past (creating an illusion of neutrino oscillations). If entropy is flowing from future to past in the "lower" mass shell and from past to future in the "upper" mass shell, then this could effect a potent rectification. I would envisage an e-po pair (especially when formed in a BEC) being created out of positive and negative energy so long as the "top" fermion is positive energy and the "lower" negative energy. If these positrons and electrons could interact, they should truly annihilate to zilch-nada-nothing, unlike the e-po pairs created from high energy "collisions" where meeting leads to the release of their stored positive energy to a pure radiation of electromagnetic waves ("light"). Furthermore, on the tiniest scale, there is an increased probability of local polarisation (therefore positive to negative "attraction") that, at any significant distance, fades to a net neutral charge. This focal dipole effect could possibly contribute to the force we regard as gravity.
There is still a lot of thought needed to try and sort this out in a satisfying explanation of why so many neutrinos flow through us at what appears to be close to the speed of light. Perhaps the only ones we are able to interact with do drop down to our inwards and outwards photon velocity as they enter or leave matter structures "radially".
So: some thoughts on what components might be ingredients of the universe/antiverse
- Ultimately, the fundamental building block is magnetic-space. This emerges spontaneously from fundamental uncertainty. We could say that is just space – a bubble of expansion into "forward" or "backward" entropy. To balance the energy books, every expansion into "forward" entropy must be balanced by an equal and opposite expansion into "backward" entropy. It need not be coincident provided the time borrowed (created) is very brief. So, we can end up with an oscillation back and forwards. An expansion into "forward-space" leads to a circumferential "restoring force" (corresponding to lines of magnetic force - north wanting to restore in one entropy direction and south in the opposite direction. Now how this might harmonise with string theory (lines, discs and spheres).
- Two photons can now combine and entangle to create an e-po pair. The "primordial" ones will be across absolute zero temperature (BEC favouring conditions) and create two oppositely charged fermions occupying opposite entropy directions. This is where it all (probably) "originates" – but remember that, in cyclic time, this is likely to be a phase rather than a creation point; "because it is logical, it exists".
- E = mc2 falls out naturally from this view of the formation of e-pos as does spin one half.
- The use of "i" (the square root of -1) takes on a new perspective. If a hypotenuse contains both universal distance and antiversal distance (interpreted by us as time) then these equations – specifying the hypotenuse as A, the opposite as B and the adjacent as C – offer a correction:
A and B correctly identified respectively as the hypotenuse and adjacent: A2 = B2 + C2
A and B incorrectly identified respectively as the hypotenuse and adjacent: (iA)2 = (iB)2 + C2
so A and B simply swap sides to restore order. I am assuming that time is simply antiversal distance and anything that extends "below" the zero origin changes from distance to time. That sits nicely with circular motion around a static zero-point – starting at the centre-bottom, it goes forward and up then up and backwards then backwards and down then down and forwards) - The Dirac equation (I think) predicts 4 flavours of fermions which would satisfy generating both positive and negative energy electrons and positrons.
- The generation of "e-po pairs" (parentheses because they may appear to us as neutrinos but are electrons/muons/taus etc within the "mirror-verse".
- Those e-pos generated in deep intergalactic space in Bose Einstein Condensates (BEC) are "special". They are generated by intrinsic uncertainty (from virtual particles of a perfectly balanced Σ-zero energy that arises in "forward", positive energy entropy –and "backward" negative energy entropy). They are "permanently" rectified due to their opposing entropic directions. Should they ever meet again (I reckon not until they have completed a full time cycle – now to future to past and back to now – and vice versa).
- e-pos generated by the interaction of high energy photons (I guess it's a pair) that generate a positive energy e-pos (fermion) pair. When they interact their constituent positive energy photons are released and the fermion matter ceases to exist.
- These two different "flavours" of e-pos result in an interaction analogous to the dark and bright interference patterns of photons and matter waves; there is either true annihilation or double augmentation. Light is unique in this respect where true annihilation can occur.
- This would allow the evolutionary emergence of all the more combinant "particles" scrambling "down the wormhole" between the universal constituents and the antiversal constituents. Note that a particle may well be an illusion that is the manifestation of the kinetic energy phase at crossover of the photonic pair, whilst the space around the particle is a balancing potential energy (a sea-saw) at the "margins" of the particle's – zitterbewegung? – oscillating presence).
- Neutrinos should, in this view, be the antiversal fermions' equivalent to electrons, muons and taus.
- Mass would be linked to the electromagnetic "attraction" of the entangled but oppositely charged fermion (gravity would be the accumulation of a very large populations of e-pos and their "down the entanglement tunnel" constructs). That poses a problem for the interpretation of the Higgs particle. But, could it possibly be that a higher order fermion (7 entangled photons) has been identified as a Higgs boson? Its observed decay into two muons would be consistent with that. This is absurd heresy that I have no right even to moot; but, perhaps a strong reason should be found to dismiss it.
- The very nature of this need for evanescent loans and quick returns leads us to how electrons might be generated from a BEC like condition. If the loans and return continuously oscillate – as in zitterbewegung – then a transient virtual particle can be endowed with some permanence and that permanence will only cease when their inverse entropies take them round the time cycle to reunite (and truly annihilate?). Zitterbewegung oscillates (theoretically) at 2mc2/ℏ – which is in the gamma ray band at about 1021 Hz.